/bbwai/ - bbwai

In addition, here's some info that's helpful regarding the models available, with images in sequence of each with the following prompt; >princess daisy burping while stuffing herself, gluttony, overeating, stuffed belly, full to bursting, huge belly, bloated belly, swollen belly, sweaty, aroused, blushing, belly noises, burping Style isn't included so as to get a feel for what each model considers "default". ----------------------------- >BiggerGirls Model B intended for realistic fatties, i.e. photos/3D/realistic drawings, not really recommended for 2D/drawn unless you have a kink for uncanny valley nightmares or are one of the 5 people keeping the guys drawing hyperreal 2D fats in business >BBW hil geared primarily toward drawn styles with the best results I've seen so far on 2D prompts, just as bad at 3D/photorealism as Model B is at 2D/drawn, essentially B's polar opposite to the point it won't even try 3D/realism in most cases >BBW Aurora Borealis defaults to manga, hentai and otherwise eastern-style results, also prone to producing body horror and otherwise crap anatomy without careful guidance >BiggerGirls v5 general fallback you probably don't want unless the above ones fail to produce what you want somehow, works okay but tends to produce "smudgy" 2D art and fucked-up faces by default >Anything v5 not recommended for anyone, last-ditch fallback that has the highest probability of shitting out nonsensical, body horror-laden abominations and general ugliness that's pretty hard to wank to

Just had an issue and feel like a real dumbass but need clarification. For context I like shortstacks ie Midna and that body type but most sites like pixai struggle getting that shape for the character without unfortunately putting something to get a shorter body in the descriptor and that has worked to create shorter more stacked women. So I tired as fuck tried the exact same prompts here, and justifiably got banned for a specific term slapping my dumbass forehead which is all fine and good. Only question, will it actually contact my isp cause id rather not have to deal with a really fuckin awkward but solvable call.

Not sure if this is exactly the right thread but I think a RAT got into my browser because I had a tab open with stuffer.ai, and when I came back to it I was told I was banned for "underage content" it said my IP was logged and would be reported to my ISP, should I be panicking?

Well, this was fun! Here's my favorite images out of what I genned in a twenty-minute experimental session. Would enjoy one that can mimic artstyles, but as someone with a potato computer, I'll take what I can get.

Have yourselves a blonde catgirl! Produced these a while back.

Does anyone know why this happens? I just copied a prompt from the images below and they automatically banned me

>>14502 Well this dissuades my worry about that message, I also got that message from an innocuous prompt, It seems to just be guessing if something is underage and bans you if it happens to create something that does so. so im just going to assume that the message is just there to scare people and has no actual weight past the ban.

>>14504 Hey let's hope that and nothing too bad happens..... because I did it as well

I tested this out, but couldn't see any pics I generated.

Some stuff I genned up last night. Clownpiece, Chara, and a maid.

I accidentally generated Belarus(Hetalia) on first image, Prompt was 1girl, masterpiece, gigantic breasts, hyper ass, hyper hourglass, thick thighs, fat legs, long legs, wide hips, voluptuous, chubby, tall girl, sexy maid outfit, skirt lift, pantyhose, high quality, detailed, cute face, seductive smile, blue eyes, blushing, looking at viewer, long hair, flowing hair, inside a manor, realistic With bbw hill3.1

>>14502 >What? You typed 1girl instead of 1woman? Off to the woodchipper with you, pedo! This truly do be a bruh moment.

Oh my god. I cant see any images ive generated too

Hey there, I'm the person working on stuffer.ai. I got rid of the banning nonsense finally today since it's frankly just obnoxious and caused too many false positives so I'd like to apologize to those who accidentally had to deal with that. I'm trying to keep censorship to the bare minimum to avoid the recent generations list from going to shit and might just create a toggle to remove any annoying filters if a user decides to make their session private from the recent images list as a work around for any issues that may arise from it. Also for anyone wondering that ban feature had no teeth and I just had that message for shits and giggles in hopes that it would scare off the handful of people who kept trying to flood the site with fucked content nonstop when I first went public with it. But yeah clearly a bit too far so I'm sorry for scaring some of you. It certainly hasn't been cheap keeping it completely free so far so I'm glad you guys are making the most out of it so far and having fun with it. I want to make sure I can keep things that way and hopefully without bankrupting myself in the process since $300 a month currently is a bit painful lol. I'm going to work on updating to the latest biggergirls models this week and hopefully some more models too. I'm thinking it might be fun if I trained some models on more specific stufferdb content and had those up as an option too. Like models more geared to mostly sbbws or just stuffers, etc. I'm still working on adding seeds and Lora support back but that's currently a backend api limitation I'm working on getting fixed with the api dev. What sort of features would you guys like to see added? What sort of bugs have you guys experienced other than the ban bug that I should look into fixing. It seems like some of you are running into issues with your images not showing up, is that issue still happening for you guys? I disabled the ban feature so maybe it's working again now, but it not I'll keep looking into it. Any other suggestions on how to improve it are always welcome!

Youre a Saint! The problem for me is that i simply cannot see any of the images me and others are generating. Also, resulution always seems to be a bit low, which isnt a huge problem

Had some gems creating today

>>14582 It's been a lot of fun getting to use such a simple and easy AI generator, thank you so much. I'll try and make the best of it while it's available. Hopefully in the future tech will advance enough that something like this is cheap and easy for anyone. We've come a long way already. I'd love to be able to make pictures that resemble artist styles, especially TrinityFate. Higher res would be neat too BUT I know the low res has to be what's keeping this thing so fast and making the pictures bigger in filesize would spike the costs of operation, I'm sure, so the current size is perfectly acceptable.

>>14582 Well since you are looking for input, let me throw out my suggestions... Is there is a better way to handle toys and genitals? Penises are supposed to go into the mouth, not stick out of it! Maybe make a "voting" system where you can choose the next pic to be more like, or less like the one just generated. Also, a quick tooltip to explain what Guidance, Strength, and Steps do. Also what parentheses and commas do too BTW, don't take this as any sort of criticism. You're doing the work of the gods. Thanks for what you've done so far!

>>14582 Oh, and something like "recurring charachters" where you can run routines with the same faces and body types, but different outfits and poses, etc

>>14582 If there's a way you could implement it, you should have a way where you can use an image you generated and keep building off of that to work on any imperfections. (Like FrostingAi)

Is "Farting" blocked as a prompt? any time I try to generate something with it, it just refuses to generate. No error message, just an infinite loop of clicking "generate"

Is it possible to get stuffer.ai to create pics that are in first-person perspective? That is, looking down at one's own fattened body?

ok so, just to be sure, this site doesn't actually report your IP, right?

Funniest part about it so far is it just CAN'T compute asians with blonde hair - at least with the biggergirls mode set. Try as it might, the closest it gets is dark roots to blonde a third of the way out, or it frames the face with black/dark brown hair with entirely separate blonde hair. It's pretty fuckin funny

For some reason, I'm only getting thumbnails as output. Clicking on them gives 404 error Anyone else getting this or is it just me?

yo, is the generator broke?

>>14582 Can you give an update on where the image editor is at? I don't remember what the actual name is but it was where you could "paint" the area you wanted changed, then write a prompt for that area?

OP here back after a long hiatus, glad to see the thread's actually gone somewhere since I was last here. Random shit I generated included to offset the fuckton of text >being afraid of your IP being forwarded to the popo because you tried to generate shortstacks and it got misinterpreted, or because you actually did the thing I don't know why you wouldn't use a VPN when doing anything porn-related, I do every single time, basically a digital condom. If you're unable to pay for one there's pretty decent free ones out there, the one I use is "ProtonVPN", no issues to report and it isn't slow so I'll mildly shill for it on the basis of it being well-made. If they become shit in the future, consider my endorsement retracted. And besides that, I wouldn't put too much stock into any such threat, you gotta consider the factor of whether or not it's worth the owners'/administrators' time to bother pursuing. One guy generating sketchy shit when he tries to prompt "imp midna with a gigantic fat ass" isn't exactly going to get SWAT'd, even if it does technically break an unseen rule. Now, if you were intentionally trying to do a legally-iffy prompt and kept at it even post-ban for whatever reason, someone who's on the website staff MIGHT look into it, but I still doubt it heavily. Moot point anyways now that the filters are gone and the guy working on it clarified it was just to spook away the real freaks, but yeah, still applies pretty much anywhere else. If you get spooked, just remember; You aren't important or special relative to anyone else online unless you go attaching your name and face to everything or antagonizing people like an idiot, and that's a very good thing, because it means you're not worth looking into or messing with. >>14582 >the guy working on it actually posted in my shit thread >and removed the banning filters when asked Shit, glad to see you here, this generator has gotten a lot better as of late so props to you for working on it, and actually improving it rather than gimping it like most other image generators out there. Great timing too, it started getting really good just as bing's AI went into full on puritan lockdown. Capitalize on your competitors' massive fuckups, and all that. >suggestions I realize this is dumb, but would you be willing to train a model to focus mainly or exclusively on "western"/non-eastern 2D art? As in, the kind of thing you find as rare gems buried in the sea of trash on deviantart or twitter. I most likely have shit taste, but I love the simple, cartoony style a lot of those types of images have, probably due to it being some of my earliest exposure to this whole thing. Not asking you to do something pants-on-head stupid like throwing in mistystuffer circle-tool-in-MSPaint garbage or similar, I just mean the good stuff. I can provide a list of artists I think might be good for this if desired, potential mockery be damned. If not, no worries, I can always just finagle the existing models or any new ones made for other purposes into making what I want. Aside from that, labeling the options + models and what they do, or providing a sheet of info to expand similar to the "old" version might be nice. Little bit unclear what some of it does unless you either go through trial-and-error to figure it out, or look it up in terms of how AI image generators work.

I just wanted to thank OP for turning us on to this and the guy for making it. I've been kinda clueless about prompts and stuff when I 1st started trying. Mainly was just perusing the stuff everyone else has generated in these threads. Sometimes they're real bangers, other times it's like 'Whoop! There's that 3rd leg again!' Hhaha Can't afford these other site's costs right now and most everything else just slaps me with the 'Too Inappropriate' regardless of how tame I try to make it. But thanks again and keep up the good work. Can't really think of any ideas atm myself that hasn't already been said. Figured I'd toss in a few of what I've come up with. Maybe something akin to a yes/no type thing like 'Is THIS your card?' lol

Hyper ass maid outfit skirt lift looking at viewer pantyhose blue eyes blushing hyper hourglass thicc legs smirk turned around you can see her ass naked 1girk hyper ass hyper hourglass bursting leggingz

is it down?

yeah it's been down since late last night at least. it's a shame. I really like using it to tinker around, at least until I decide to try messing around with stable diffusion or proper AI tools

>>15194 Lame. I just started using it yesterday. Does it go down and come back often? I think someone else asked if it was broken before.

Looks like it'll be a minute

Asuka with a huge badonkadonk

"YOUR GRANDMOTHER SUCKS DONKEY COCKS!!!"

>>15218 What's the other project?

Hey uhh, is it just me, or has the quality kinda gone down since the update? Like I know thr text is still up there about "models being off", but its been like almost a day since it came back. Do I just need to wait longer for it to get back to normal or what?

>>15358 Yeah, it's definitely not 100% right now. It can't make anime-style pics like it used to. Give it time and it should hopefully be in a better spot later! Here's some stuff I genned pre-shutdown.

>>14465 Does anyone know what promts to use to get voreish results? Like, to make the belly all bumpy and stuff. Examples of what i mean:

>>15403 Depends on the model, but commonly "vore belly, struggling prey, imprint". Same tags you'll find on r34/e621 for vore

Any suggestions for terms that might be likely to produce something in the vicinity of this? Not my ideal shape (more for the all-around big or at very least realistic proportions regardless whether the size itself is realistic or not), but I've been kind of not exactly obsessing but in that neighborhood over the character (CantankerousAvian's Edie) and her story for at least a few weeks now.

>>15407 Hmmm, I'm not getting the desired results. Any other suggestions?

>>15367 How do I get art styles like these? It keeps giving me half realistic animeish pieces no matter what I write.

>>15490 Yea give me a week to finish training the next Hyperfusion, and you'll have no problems with it.

Its not quite back to the original level of quality, but it's definitely going up if you're willing to keep trying the same thing a couple dozen times. It helps if you specify a detailed face and symmetrical eyes

>>15498 For real? Thanks mate! I appreciate it a bunch!

At the moment, you can't. I've checked on it each day and the latest gens are all that weird, grody half-realistic style. Stuffer still isn't back to full operations. Gonna have to wait and hope it can get fixed.

>>15510 Was already training a new model for the past few weeks, so almost done with it. Currently has 12k vore related tags which is just enough to be consistent. Obviously the focus is still hyper sizes and vore is just a small portion of the total dataset 500k images now.

>>14465 Man, for the last 3 days i haven't been able to make any images, not on my pc or phone. Is it down? or maybe cuz of many users using it? I tried doing it at different hours of the day, and there wasn't any change. I put "generate txt2image", for a micro second "generating..." appears and boom, back to "generate txt2image" without a result. Sometimes it sticks to "generating..." for a bit longer like 5 seconds and then goes back to "generate txt2image" again.

>>15630 Nevermind, figured out what was wrong... Apparently, "small chest" is banned or something, cuz i tried changing everything in my prompts and nothing worked until i changed "small chest" to "huge chest" wtf

>>15631 Wtf, same thing happened to me. I changed it to small breasts and it worked no problem so i figured it was just something weird on my end

>>15634 Tried other promts, apparently so far "small chest", "petite chest" and "flat chest" make any promts unusuable. Also happened with "cute face".

>>15367 Yo deez look good, what prompts did ya use?

>>15469 Bumping my question, sorry if this isn't the thread for it but since I'm looking specifically for advice re: the site the thread is about, I figure it can't hurt.

>>15516 Ay mate, been a while. How's the progess so far? (not wanting to hurry you up or something, just wanted to check)

>>15737 Thanks! I didn't save my prompts list, but generally what I'd do is something like this: * Start with the character name and franchise, if it's a media character, plus a descriptive tag or two like "black hair" or "twintails". This sometimes helped it find the right character. * Include a couple body tags like "curvy", "wide hips", "thick thighs", and "tight clothes". * Once I had a recognizable character, I'd usually gen them multiple times, swapping between Hil and Aurora pretty much just for the heck of it, and steadily adding more fat-related tags. "Belly" usually gets the belly to come out of the clothes. Other good tags included "plump" and "fat". * If you want a shot from behind, avoid front-facing tags like "blue eyes" or "smile" and include back-facing tags like "from behind" and "huge ass". * Always try to remember to include a tag for the background, like "arcade" or "desert" or "city at night". It's just more fun that way instead of the girls floating in a void. Problem is, though, all of these pictures were made BEFORE Stuffer's shutdown and return. The current site still isn't producing the same results it did pre-shutdown. The girls don't have this style any more no matter which model you choose in the menu, and they all have a doll-like, "early AI art" look to them I don't like and so I haven't done any serious genning since it came back. I really hope it updates to be like how it was before (or better), because right now it's just a non-starter for me.

Alright I’ve been playing with it for like a month and I still have no idea what any of the sliders mean. Can someone enlighten this autist 🗿

Why is literally everything generating as realistic instead of anime girls?

>>15813 This is part of the aforementioned brokenness we've seen since the generator came back online. The generators that used to do drawn style by default do realistic instead. Tags can convince it to make anime-esque images, but they're inferior to what the pre-shutdown generator made. Hoping for a fix.

What the fuck happened and why does it suck.

This fucking sucks. All it wants to do is make really shitty anime pics now.

gonna be real with yall... rly don't dig the new options like at all. there's just too much going on. :/

>>15945 git gud scrub

>>15817 I was so excited to use this before seeing it ruined by only now genning with extreme realism bias. I was desperately hoping to generate stuff like this.

>>15945 that was literally the best part. bruh

>>15945 I can't even get some of the new options to work, like no matter what dimensions I choose it always gives me a small square image. That option worked before.

>>16001 Yeah. I don't understand why it's still broken when the message at the top of the page said it would only be "weird and broken" for "a few hours". Maybe the Discord link right below that message explains why it's so much worse now but I don't have Discord. It's been about two weeks since the shutdown. Did not think it would STILL be so inferior to how it performed in mid-October. It's very disappointing, this generator had a lot of promise.

>>16019 Wait, I just actually checked it for the first time in a few days and actually it's working much better. Try using the "Aurora Borealis" model, I'm getting results similar to what I used to get. I think I can work with this. Will keep messing around.

>>16020 Okay, yeah, it's definitely working WAY better than it was when I tried it last week, I was able to get these pretty nice Stellas from it just now. I'm much happier with it now than I was earlier this month. A big thanks to the owner for working to get it back to how it was before.

>>15817 I messaged the discord and was told they're gonna add presets for negative prompt to even better control if you get realism or anime looking gens.

Some idiot programmed some type of bot to generate dozens of images per minute and now its impossible to use

>>16110 Well, fuck. Must be many, since there's a cool down and stuff.

>>15516 Yo, how is it going? How's the model with vore theme included going?

>>16114 I put it on Civitai the other day. tags.csv is included in the "training data" section. So you can see what tags are available to try. https://civitai.com/models/186849/hyperfusion-finetune-550k-images There is a LoRA available too but the ckeckpoint will understand concepts much better overall.

>>16114 Here's a hastily thrown together exmaple. Prompt in the image metadata. Use hyperfusion belly size tags to adjust the size.

Rem from re:zero

No clue why, but adding "cel-shaded" to Aurora Borealis seems to increase the quality of the generations immensely

>>16120 How do i implement this in the site, exactly? Sorry if it's a silly question, i'm still a bit new to all of this

>>16120 I'm trying with the bbw aurora borealis but it doesn't work, am i doing something wrong? Should i use another model?

Very fun experiment upscaling w AI and playing with generative fill + spot filling in PS to fix the weirder parts of a render.

>>16218 I only run it locally with Automatic1111, so I wont be able to help with AI gen sites.

>>16219 The LoRA may not understand the concept well enough, (or you have to give it a lot of prompt weight). I'm using the hyperfusion checkpoint in that image.But I can try and see how it works with Aurora.

>>16219 Yea, the LoRA doesn't do that concept well on Aurora, not sure why. Try the hyperfusion checkpoint since I know that one works well for that concept.

>>16258 >>16255 Which one is that?

>>16258 I don't see anything called hyper fusion checkpoint on the site.

>>16260 >>16261 >https://civitai.com/models/186849/hyperfusion-finetune-550k-images Link was above image

>>16286 What do I do with this?

>hey lets just add another feature >and another feature >and another feature >and another feature >and another feature >and another feature >and another feature

Tried using this to make something that there is not enough of, and that i desperately want to see more of - Indian BBWs.

>>16556 Why complain about features? I mean I know most people are aware of what bloat is (pun intended) but it's better than features being removed.

>>14465 How do I make a good "before and after" image? Any prompts or phrases to make it understand that one girl should be skinny and the other fat or with a big belly instead of just making both fat?

Been experimenting with Stuffer.ai months ago. Very glad with how the results turn out for a chubby Aurora.

>get don't use proxy message >have never used a proxy in my life pardon?

>>16674 Please, we need more of this rare beauty!

been messing around creating ussbbw sizes with some good results, obviously the fine details aren't great but was pretty pleased with how it rendered hugeness

>>17168 Bump

Here’s the biggest blob mountain hyper ussbbw I’ve maned to create..

zero two eating a burger

>>17821 That isn't how this works.

Anybody had any luck using the img2img feature

Guess who this is kinda sorta meant to be

>>17929 That was a new one on me honestly, but I've gotten it to work. The first image is something I managed to drum up on another site a while back before I found this here in the forums and I kept re-feeding it back in to its img2img with limited success, but I got better results here on the 1st shot with zero prompts. The last image I did use some prompts as a test to ensure it was actually taking the prompts along with the image. All in all I consider this a great addition. Definitely need to tweak some things on my end cuz just ((pink hair)) made damn near everything in the image pink, lol.

busted 3 nuts in a few hours. this shit is ruining my life

>>18419 Youre not alone during the summer time I can bust 2 loads in 20 mins.

What do you put in the prompt to prevent characters from being fused together and prevent extra legs or whatever?

>>18432 Thats just what Bob Ross calls "Happy Accidents." Laugh and hit the generate button again.

>>18432 Be sure to share any primo orbtaculars

their bellies are out of this world, get it? because they're aliens? heh

food must be higher in calories on their home planet

uhhh. alien joke

large black women are lowkey underrated

Hey does anyone know what happened to all of the model options on stuffer ai? Like Bg real and bg Irl? It’s only showing 3 options now.

>>18666 Yeah I only have 3 models accessible too. Who knows, maybe they will come back. In the meantime I had a few acceptable ones I could get out of the models I don't particularly care for.

Personally stuff kinda shit the bed when they started censoring words

>>18666 Yeah, same for me. Now I can't do vore stuff.

Hope they bring back other models

The new animation or whatever is fucking up the site when I check it out on my phone, wtf. Cut that out, everything gets laggy as shit and stuff starts disappearing and reapiring.

Does anyone have a good prompt for changing just a specific part of an image? For example, if I generated a great image but I want to remove the model's bra but leave everything else exactly the same?

>>18894 https://www.photopea.com/

Wii fit trainer

>>18894 What you could do is copy the image settings and leave the seed it generated the same and add to the prompt to remove the part you're wanting to modify

Americaaaaa FUCK YEAH

>>18827 No one needs your cannibalism shit