>>84181
Dont agree with the Afro centrism (didn’t read your post ngl, since I could tell what it was from afar) but there is a universally notable vivaciousness about healthy fat women.
Skinny is just a safer bet for most women since it lends itself to waifish feebleness which is like it or not a feminine sex signaler, it demonstrates cerebrally either a lack of food drive or an overcoming of it (generally the latter is what matters, ie self control), and if they’re ugly, their is frankly less of them. It’s culturally and socially safely acceptable. Size, especially fat, also slows you down, and most women aren’t quick, put together or graceful to begin with.
Yet if you hooked every man’s dick up to a lie detector Richter scale combo, most men’s dicks would probably tell you they prefer the hottest percentages of women to be at the furthest ends and further of the healthy BF% charts bell curve. Since hot generally means healthy, women’s health is correlated with higher fat percentages at a base, and a women who maintains these outward signaling at even higher weights is basically super winning from an evolutionary standpoint point.
At least that’s one point of my fat chick loving theory. Also models are meant for costumes designed by gays.
>TLDR SKINNY BITCHES ARE COPE, FAT BITCHES ARE QUEENS