I don't mean to offend anybody here but is there any way that we could at least relegate all AI "art" to a single thread? Just saying.... it sucks.

>>1697 That is indeed the purpose of this thread. Around 1000 AI generated images were posted here rather than anywhere else during the last thread's lifetime. I can't control what others post elsewhere. And frankly, plenty of non-AI art that gets posted on this board sucks even worse. There's still lots of good stuff, and I'll agree that AI art as it is lacks personality at the moment, but it's better than circle-tool and children's DeviantArt monstrosities drawn and posted by the needlessly confident.

>>1696 Quick knowledge recap: https://rentry.org/voldy https://rentry.org/sdupdates2 https://rentry.org/anime_and_titties https://rentry.org/faces-faces-faces My known bbw-favorable western styles ((X art style)) in front of prompt: Pierre-Auguste Renoir, Gaston Bussière, Édouard Manet, Daniel Ridgway Knight, Clara Peeters, Andrei Markin, Michael Garmash, Duane Bryers, Henri-Pierre Danloux, John William Godward, John Collier, John William Waterhouse, Eugene de Blaas, William-Adolphe Bouguereau, Adolph Menzel, Alexandr Averin, Alan Lee, Albert Lynch, Albrecht Anker, Alyssa Monks, Anders Zorn, Andrea Kowch, Andrew Atroshenko, Anne-Louis Girodet de Roussy-Trioson, Anton Mauve, Arthur Hacker, Helene Knoop, Briton Rivière, Dean Cornwell, Rembrandt, Goya My known bbw-favorable eastern styles (many, many more in the anime guide above): kanon, ruu, rossdraws, Nitroplus Fixing eyes, from least drastic to most drastic: "deep pupils", "wide pupils", "bright pupils", "beautiful pupils" Negative prompt for fixing eyes: (lazy eye), ((heterochromia)) My default negative prompt: (lazy eye), ((heterochromia)), lowres, bad anatomy, bad hands, text, error, missing fingers, extra digit, fewer digits, cropped, worst quality, low quality, normal quality, jpeg artifacts, signature, watermark, username, blurry, bad feet, extra limbs, multiple navels, two navels BBW terms that aren't booru tags that are known to some effect: love handles, belly overhang, flabby belly, soft belly, weight gain, plus size, plus size model, fat, obese, fat face, double chin, fat arms, fat hips, fat thighs... BBW-friendly booru terms: plump, thick thighs, fat ass, navel focus, navel, deep skin, skindentation, undersized clothes, button gap, torn clothes, midriff, ... slob / eating friendly booru terms: food on breasts, food on body, food in mouth, food on face, eating, food, cake, cream, cream on body, hand on own stomach, heavy breathing, blush, ... SSBBW tips: Generate a bbw using txt2img, then take that result and warp it in photoshop/GIMP to increase the size of the subject. It can be a very hasty warp as long as the general shape is good. Take that warped image and feed it into img2img with the same prompt but with a different seed. Play around with the prompt as desired. Alternatively, use a picture or illustration of SSBBW as a base, or make a crude tracing of it and fill in the desired colors, and feed that into img2img. Here's my take at android 21 that I couldn't get quite right, plus some other images. >>1697 Look, I keep all my generated content in this thread. If AI art upsets you there's nothing we can do about it here. And yeah, there's hand-drawn fetish art that's far worse than this both qualitatively and expressively.

>>122728 Frankly, I couldn't disagree more, AI art is the worst. However it's true that all of bbwdraw is garbage regardless and also that you have done well. 👍

Is it possible to Img2Img black and white photos with the colorlessness being preserved?

Found something interesting. I was watching my Studio Ghibli film collection while doing some other work for my other hobby, as one does, and inspiration struck. Giving your image the Ghibli Artstyle makes for rather cute faces. I'll have to experiment with this later. Some seeds make it look a bit more K-ON than classic Ghibli, but more investigation is warranted.

>>1704 Good find. There's also a huge list of anime (and other) styles in this guide if you want to experiment with any: https://rentry.org/anime_and_titties I have tried Livia Prima which worked out pretty well.

>>1704 Trying to get a more Nausicaa-ish Nausicaa, but the artstyle insists on being a bit more modern than the oldest Ghibli works.

>>1705 Similar prompt but with different art styles. Sometimes I have to inpaint a belly button which is placed too high, but that's better than double belly buttons which occur with frequency in the default art style.

>>1706 More interesting info: The Ghibli style can be mixed with classic artists' styles for more results. However, the Ghibli also likes having higher Steps (which costs Anlas even on opus tier) or it looks somewhat low-quality.

silver fox tries out some self-experimentation with her potions P.S. hello to the fellow KF enjoyer from the previous thread

I'll like to request a progression of either makima because chainsaw man been doing numbers or hestia from danmachi cuz shortstack supremacy a big thanks to whoever does this

I don't know what prompts or voodoo magic or wizardry was at work here but I need more of this. Fuckhuge belly spilling over tight pants, big ol boobers, and just as big of a smile. Dunno if it would work, but if you could also give her dark skin and blonde hair I would likely paint my ceiling white.

>>1709 I assume White Lion is supportive(?)

>>1713 Unless she doesn’t notice(?)

>>1713 habits are contagious, as the saying goes though I have a feeling the big cat didn't need any appetite-stimulating drugs to soften up, unlike her partner

Tried measured breast growth with this one, but the seed ended up sputtering out sooner than I had hoped. 1/2

>>1716 2/2 with bonus pics. Who wants some yuri? The last pic genned weird characters, but I enjoyed the belly rubbing and S/M nature of the shot enough that I wanted to upload it anyway.

>>1717 I dont think there's that much Yuri ai content out there so please let there be more

>>1718 That's because it seems to be quite difficult, especially with a nice size difference. My bad gens included characters oozing into each other, them being merged into a four-breasted monstrosity, them having swapped hair colors and lengths (as can be seen in the one pic, although they look different enough they might as well be OCs), as well as the standard weird proportions and extraneous nipples. And since I don't like posting without pics, a test sequence of Fate/Stay Night without specifying a character. Looks a bit like a pink-haired Aoi Tohsaka.

>>1715 on the subject of KF, Maybe Lion and Moose got into an eating contest, but forgot to set a victory condition?

Some new experiments.

>>1721 and a few more. I'm gonna crack "lifting belly" one of these days (see first image). that or the next database update will take care of it.

>>1722 And a few more. Definitely noticing a hard 'white' bias here. several of the previous images started as IMG2IMG with photos of non-white models, and they almost universally turn pearly white in the first generation.

>>1712 Thanks pal. It's a shame that the AI doesn't seem to like tanned/brown fatties per >>1723 but I assume it's simple enough to add {dark skin} or something like that to the prompt, right?

👌

>>1721 The red dress one looks like it could have been an img2img of Lexxxi Luxe/Anorei Collins, I'm curious what the input was, if anything

>>1724 not really, unfortunately. I had to paint on the original image and reprocess it a few times to get that result. First attached is the result of Img2Img with an overweighted Dark Skin tag, as you can see there's nearly no change. Second is with running the exact same prompt without a seed image, now we've got darker skin but it's more of a tan. and the final one is the same img2img but I've cranked the 'strength' as high as I can before it just ignores the root image. closer, but we really loose the shape of her. So, most reliable results I've gotten have been from editing an image and feeding that back to the model.

>>1726 Good eye! I see that too. unfortunately it was late, I was high, and I didn't make a note of what image I used. I recall grabbing something random off the BBW board, I believe it was a low-rez mirror selfie. attached is the first generation, you can see she looks significantly different. (interesting aside, I recall the original photo was a white woman, but the first gen made her distinctly black. Kinda flies in the face of my previous point, but interesting regardless.)

>>1720 I wonder what that entails... Staying there? Going about your day as usual while occasionally returning to do pointless contest?

To bring some over from the last thread.

Edit of ananna0315 art (image 1) from other thread.

A certain idol, 1/3.

>>1732 Idol, 2/3 Finally got a belly so droopy it goes over the crotch and looks reasonably nice doing so.

>>1733 Idol 3/3. Finishes with some side-view and a half-decent belly grab. For those who also want to see a grabbed belly, I suggest the tag "deep skin," as it refers to skin that squishes when grabbed as opposed to "skindentation" which is squishing caused by tight clothes.

Some style tests. It recognizes these as namehere style Umamusume, Fire Emblem, Lucky Star, Genshin Impact. It does not recognize Blue Archive, as instead of altering the base style, it made her skin blue, and I had to struggle not to vomit.

>>1729 It means both of them keep eating because neither wants to lose, but neither of them knows when to stop. Stuffing/belly expansion/breast expansion ensues.

Some tests with "speed lines, trembling, bouncing breasts, bouncing belly" and undersized clothes and other usual keywords >>1715 >>1721 >>1722 >>1723 excellent work >>1735 Good shading on some of those styles. Good tests.

Im trying to get it generate nipples but i can’t manage to do it, how do i?

>>1738 Are you using the right generation set? Im not a user, but there's something like a "animecuratedsfw" or an "animefull" in the mix- using the former will only generate "sfw", so even if they're naked, there's no nips or vag.

>>1738 Use the nsfw and nipples tags. As a warning, nsfw is a very strong tag and may dilute other styles you want, as well as cause errors such as extra breasts and nipples in various places. I sometimes find it necessary to diminish it with brackets. Here are some more artstyle tests without a character specified. Sadly, I could not get another belly grab. It seems to be a very rare seed or combination that gets a good squeeze... I've got a couple of Senran Kaguras (note: Yaegashi Nan as an artstyle did not work), a classical art, Pokemon, and one in Kobayashi's Dragon Maid's artstyle. Interestingly enough, it tended to generate pseudo-Kannas with rainbow hair most of the time.

>>1738 to agree with >>1740, NSFW gets wild quickly, so I've had more luck with specifying nipples, topless, naked, etc. here's some breast expansion

>>1741 another breast expansion, plus some jizz for you extra-degens.

>>1742 and what would a bbwdraw thread be without some weight gain?

>>1743 and a grab bag of some interesting results.

>>1744 and 'cause I can be a degen too, a few jizz soaked options.

>>1741 after seeing these lined up, another interesting thing comes to mind: whenever I generate seriously exaggerated features (giant tits, huge belly, etc), the composition of the image shifts to a fisheye lens. Of course this only happens with images that have discernable backgrounds. Just a shot in the dark here, but I'm guessing there's some weighting happening due to a number of fisheye style images (or even photos depending on how this dataset was actually created) that focus on these features. Like, think of the number of BBW models you've seen that have taken advantage of a fisheye lens to exaggerate their features. It's interesting to see that replicated here without explicitly calling for it. blah blah shut up and post more images

what is the artist's name? and does it have patreon?

>>1749 First of all, this thread is dedicated for AI generated art. This means that there is nobody who actually drew them, but a computer (with possibly a GTX 1080 or something). The AI often relies on other artwork as a way of training, or inspiration, if you will. Put it simply, nobody but a computer made these, and no, they're not on Patreon.

>>1744 How do you get results like that. >>1745 And how you get the jizz soak?

Could someone please give it some tube feeding (or even better, forced tube feeding) prompts and see how it comes out? I’m thinking about getting NovelAI to make these sorts of images for the force feed thread, but I’m not sure if the AI will be able to add the tube and other elements in a convincing way.

>>1751 The best results (for the most part) come from starting with a target image. I've paired up a few here for reference. I've also been having good luck by starting with a specific "art style" by naming an artist, then describing the scene in plain language (making sure to try different versions of fat/plump/obese with different adverbs). Throw in a few more tags to focus on specific aspects of what you're looking for, then process it a few times. Sometimes I'll feed the results back into the model, other times I'll find a seed that looks good and tweak from there. As for the jizz, soaked/drenched seems to work pretty well, and I've even used 'cum' alongside it if the wet looks more like water/sweat. Of course, sometimes that's what I actually want, but ymmv. But really, it's all just vibes man. reprocess a few times, change tags, take an image to a photo editor and roughly morph it, feed that back in and start over. >>1752 I've only seen one person get any kind of eating to look right, and I've definitely never gotten a hose or any kind of funnel feeding to look right. That being said, if you've got any force-feeding images to share, I could take a crack at feeding that into the model and seeing what we get. I wouldn't hold my breath though.

>>1754 >>1751 Another example. Started with a brilliant image from BetterWithSalt, ran it through the model a few times to find a slightly different art style to lock into, then keeping that seed I (really fucking roughly) edited it in PS to make a before and after image, then ran those through with nearly identical tags and the original seed. That being said, this one tested the limits of what I'm comfortable doing with this stuff. It's one thing to start with either a photo, a 3d render, or a particularly rough sketch (ideally by a non-artist or someone who's just fucking around), but for some reason taking an active artist in the community and doing this felt kinda bad. Like I was stealing from them, if that makes sense. In the future I'm aiming to stay away from active 2d artists in the scene for source material.

Can you give sayori from ddlc a huge belly

Can anyone do a fat Kirika from symphogear?

Do you guys think you can try stuff with trinityfate’s art?

>>1754 I am curious about what you can do with someone as BoBerry maybe with all of this.

>>1759 yeah, me too.

>>1760 and an even bigger butt. >>1756 yuh >>1758 ok, one more time. Like I said here >>1755 doing this feels kinda not great. Like, I'm pretty sure I could commission TrinityFate to do this, and they deserve the money. That's why I at least do some style mixing so it's not just a pure clone of their work.

>>1754 here's a few i think the AI could have an easier time recognizing i think it might be better to give images that are a tube connected to some sort of mask (that way the AI doesnt need to sync the tube with the mouth) but i don't have any of those saved

>>1762 Are there more parts to that 2nd image?

>>1763 full sequence it goes too quick imo, i wish he would have made the clothes tearing frames on picture 3 their own fully-drawn page source is magnivorewf

>>1764 Thanks, although I think the pace is fine for being 6 parts. Something more realistic probably would've taken triple the amount of pages to do, if not more. I wished he didn't both with the outie, looks weird.

>>1762 That's the thing, it's not the tube-in-mouth vs tube-in-mask that's the problem, its the fact that the model simply doesn't have enough consistent "stuff in mouth" images to sample from. As many force-feeding and funnel feeding images you may have come across, that's a drop in the bucket compared to "generic hot anime lady" art in the sample set. In fact, I would be deeply surprised if a single force feeding image wound up in the training set. So, the model just looses its mind when you try to convince it to output something like that, because it literally doesn't know what it's looking at. Attached are the best things to come out of all this. It obviously understands rope, chains, and restraints, but extreme body shapes tend to freak it out. It's difficult to wrangle the model to output something sane at that level of fatness, but layering on the complexity of a funnel/tube/force feeding is just too much. Or at least too much in my experience. For example, look at the green images. No matter what I did, it simply refused to connect a line to the subjects mouth. compared to the three progression pics, it had a slightly easier time since the pose was normal (the green one is at an extreme angle, making it more difficult for the model to recognize what it's looking at overall.

so as not to leave the last post full of not great images, here's a couple weight gain sequences I had luck with. No reference images to start!

>>1767 Would you be able to do a BE sequence on the scale of little/nothing to bigger-than-the-rest-of-her-body? Something like the scale that Inuteikoku/Mura works with, except not necessarily to the point that the body disappears. See also Chomikuplus' "Dawn's Ring Fit" sequence (except she starts busty)

>>1768 yeah, I'm gonna need to see some examples buddy. I have no idea what those are, and googling has not yielded anything.

Anyone know good ways to stop the AI generating comically large tits? No matter what tags I put into the avoid section or use in the prompt it likes to occasionally interpret being fat as having massive oversized tits.

>>1769 A good example of the scale for Mura's BE stuff is 318771 on nhentai Dawn RFA is here, encoded b/c it's faster than checking if encoding is necessary or not: aHR0cHM6Ly9lLWhlbnRhaS5vcmcvZy8yMzI4NjE5LzRlYWYyZDViMTcv If anything, I'm hoping it's mutually beneficial- you get practice keeping the AI to some kind of consistency between drastic size differences and I get my primary fetish catered to. If that fails to be the case, though, you don't gotta spend too much effort on it.

>>1770 It's an issue inherent to the model, it associates more things with big boobs than you would expect. Best course of action is negatively weighting tags that describe big boobs and add a "small breasts" to your positives

This was harder to generate than it needed to be. Rem kinda has a double belly button but it looks more like her belly is bent instead. I could not for the life of me get even a decent fat Emilia. Even she is a bit inaccurate but whatever.

>>1769 How are you getting the bottles/held items to look so good? In my experience it tends to generate an amorphous object unless it's a very simple shape to begin with

>>1761 >trini makes sense, i can respect that. though, it is true that the ai just doesn't hit the same as the original artist

>>1771 Mutual beneficiality aside, until I can get this running on my graphics card (compiling the AMD version keeps failing for me for some reason) I can't spend too much time on this. No offense, it's just not my cup of tea and I don't want to burn too many credits. That being said... hoo boy the model fuckin' HATES egregious body part sizes. I decided to do a re-run of the breast expansion I did here >>1741 to add a few more steps. Of note, I didn't edit the nipples on this at all, for some reason I still get a lot of gold or black dot nipples. I overcame that in the first set by manually recoloring them and reprocessing to keep the colors somewhat consistent, here I skipped that set. As you can see here, you can still get some really giant tits with little problem.

>>1776 but then this happens when you flip to room filling. I've never been able to get the model to create a truly enormous body part without photo references, even the previous version still relied on a progressive series of 'shops to get to that size. Taking the Dawn RFA example as a reference, the model either spits out garbage like in the first image, or just blatantly copies the reference when you scale it down enough to get something recognizable. I might do some more tests on hyperfats (again, all apologies, but that's more related to my personal interests), and if I figure anything useable out I'll come back to room filling tits.

>>1774 Let me be upfront: I can't claim to truly understand how this works. to borrow a metaphor from my post here >>122572 we're all just playing around with a machine that we don't understand how it works, banging on the sides of it to make it do something interesting. So, now that I've set your expectations appropriately, my best guess is context and a bit of luck. In the images you're referencing, the first three started with a reference image that had the subject holding a bottle. The last three were generated whole cloth, on the other hand. Attached here are a couple experiments. I've included the prompt at the bottom of this post if you want to play around with it yourself. The only difference between the two sets are the art style referenced at the start of the prompt, and then the resulting image used for IMG2IMG. The first three start with Svetlin Velinov as the art style guide, and I must admit the model tend to be all over the place when you reference his work. He's a very talented artist most known for his gorgeous work on MTG cards, and sometimes referencing him gets rich skin tones and excellent shading on an otherwise 'anime' style. In this case not so much; since a large portion of his work is high fantasy and creature design, I think that when your prompts are mundane the model doesn't have a lot to reference. So, even though these are pretty good, the bottles are somewhat nondescript. Helene Knoop on the other hand is a figure painter whose style is deeply rooted in classical/grecian masterworks. while I can't prove she's ever painted a bar scene, her work would fit right in with 1700's-1800's rococo and neoclassical masterworks and I guarantee there's a ton of pieces that are set in bars and pubs. So, I think there's more stuff there for the model to free-associate with and thus creates more natural looking bottles and bar scenery. Nuts and bolts wise, I go fishing by creating a prompt and letting the model create random seeds a handful of times until I stumble onto a scene that's close to what I'm looking for. I'll lock in the seed and then play around with the settings a bit (and normally add/remove/reweight tags, but I kept them static for this test). Then I'll take the best result, feed it back into the model with IMG2IMG and mess with the noise and strength values. I've generally had the most success with a slightly higher noise setting at this point, as it allows the model to create interesting/more 'realistic' backgrounds, and in this case tends to give the bottles a bit more detail. You can actually see this happen in 'real time' in the three image progression here >>1769 as the first image was my starting image, which I edited in PS and fed back in for the subsequent images. The first image has no background, the second had a high noise setting so it created something, and the third reinforced the second's results. And finally, real language prompting. Unlike most other AI image generators, everyone I've seen talking about this one stressed the importance of just using tags, and trying to hew close to the danbooru tag set. While that definitely gets reliable results, I've personally found having a plain language descriptor as one of your tags tends to create more interesting and internally consistent images. I have no idea why this works, but I encourage everyone to try it. Doesn't have to be flowery prose, just simple descriptions seem to have a net positive effect. The tags used for these: {{NAME OF ARTIST art style}}, a very plump woman stands at a bar holding a bottle, drunk, happy, flabby belly Seed for the first Svetlin Velinov image: 3542259879 Seed for the first Helene Knoop image: 1204829575

>>1776 >>1777 Ah damn, I didn't realize there was expenditure of limited resource involved, my bad. Still, I appreciate that you tried at all, that first set is still very nice, even with the weird beads (maybe it thinks they're piercings or something?). But yeah, you do you, the stuff you've been making already is great. The weight gain sequences and hyperfats still have growing/big boobs so I'm eating well either way

>>1699 Hey guys so I just downloaded the Voldy leaked AI about a day ago and spent all day playing with it. I can get some nice bodies especially after finding some of the hyper and balloon diffusion models but no matter what I do I keep getting fucked up faces where its either blank or minimal detail in the face. How do you guy get your models to have some lovely faces? Do you guys think I'm missing some kind file that helps with making faces look good or what? Heres the fruits of my labor today, last pic probably the best thing I've made on it so far.

>>1766 Hm well that makes sense. I guess not even AI can save us from the nicheness of these fetishes yet. However, someone could probably make a lot of good art by giving it something like "fat girl tied up" and then editing in a tube on the convincing ones.

oh shit. NovelAI dropped a new furry model, and it looks like it has promise for easier fetish stuff. First pair of images: used the same prompt as this >>1778 post, but added the word human at the end. Second is one single img2img reprocess with monochromatic negatively weighted. Third image prompt: a very plump woman grabs her belly, human, ssbbw, flabby belly What's remarkable is that's the first image that spat out. I can chalk some up to luck, but I've never gotten something that fat (let alone grabbing her belly!) on the first try without a seed image. Fourth Image prompt: {{rossdraws art style}}, a obese woman puts her belly on the table, side view, human, flabby belly, large breasts, blue eyes, deep navel Again remarkable thing is getting a belly on the table first try. I normally have to fight the model HARD to get anything like that without seed images. Fifth image prompt: a obese woman with a large belly that hangs to her knees standing in a bathtub, human, {{flabby belly}}, giant tits, brown hair, navel spread, side view, huge ass, {{drenched}} biggest note here is the completely reasonable looking nipples, and while the navel is slight, it's in an acceptable spot. Again, first try. A few key takeaways so far: The furry model reacts oddly to {{ARTIST NAME art style}} tags. like, it clearly knows Helene Knoop, but isn't good at drawing faces with her style (in my few attempts so far, anyway). other reliable art styles I've used in the anime model just seem to throw wild results (Mr. Velinov definitely doesn't draw like a horny Genndy Tartakovsky, for instance). Faces tend to be a mixed bag. Sometimes they're great, other times it feels like last year's level of quality (not good). But overall, I'm getting pretty good bbw/ssbbw results on the first or second generation nearly every time (as long as I include a human tag, anyway). Thank you furry community, I guess, for including so much fetish content in your art.

>>1782 and a quick weight gain sequence. this was a lot quicker, as I didn't have to fight the model as much.

>>1768 >>1779 Here you go, hyper-breast guy. Turns out furries are way better at nipples.

>>1784 and the second part

>>1776 Can someone show me how to make A.I I want to make stuff like this

>>1786 Did you try being born with talent? or perhaps simply learning to draw? Then you could aquire skills over time get better

>>1787 Wrong thread, fuck off

>>1786 correct myself I meant show me how to make A.I art

>>1784 >>1785 High quality stuff, much appreciated! Yeah, unfortunately the more niche a fetish is, the higher chance of being comorbid with furry shit.

>>1715 >>1709 Speaking of them, could anyone try an Img2Img to generate a larger form on their official artwork? Wondering how it will do this kind of render.

>>1792 Nice work on the gif bro

The shogun's consequence in eating too much dangos. Man I played with the ai and these really got me good lol.

can someone made some Hinanawi Tenshi from touhou or more Junko from ZombieLand Saga? thx

>>1791 eh, did what I could.

Is there a way to run balloon diffusion with other diffusion models on google collabs?

Here's a grab-bag of some new results. Turns out that furry model is really something else.

>>1798 I've been having a lot of luck with the furry model keeping overall cohesion even when I push body parts way past the previous limit.

>>1799 turns out it totally understands 'lactation' as well.

>>1800 also, having better luck with it understanding 3d space. Didn't even have to try to get that 'stuck in a doorframe' look.

>>1801 some jizz experiments

and some pretty big gal experiments. tried a few styles on the last three, but I really like the goofy face on the first of the three 'black robe' images.

Is there a way to download the new furry model locally? Or do I have to subscribe?

>>1804 No can do, compadre. The previous models were leaked, and I'd imagine NovelAI has locked their shit down by this point. Of course, the moment I post this someone will leak it making me look foolish. Let's call it manifesting.

>>1805 HAHAha! How about why don't we instead call it what it is? 🤭

>>1806 Look man, I get it. AI 'art' is a blight upon the world and spits in the face of artists everywhere, and I dunno, probably something about degeneracy or whatever? Cool, got it. No one here thinks that this is high art. No one here thinks that these tools replace actual artists, or that any of this is 'good' or 'of value. These AI powered image generators are *at best* a tool, but really not much more than a fancy toy. You're absolutely correct, anything generated and posted here is 'soulless.' It's fascinating to watch these tools develop and it's remarkable at how fast they've improved in such a short time span. But it'll be a long time (and I argue likely never) before any AI can replicate artistic intention. Look at the examples here >>1755 and here >>1761 Both of them start with art made by actual artists, and the results (while aesthetically pleasing to some) don't really say anything. But when you look at the source images, there's a story being told. That right there is the 'ineffable' nature of real art: the act of conveying an idea beyond the elements of the composition. (god it feels so fucking dumb having this conversation in relation to literal fap material, but here we are). Nothing I've posted does that, and I would never argue that it does. So, no. I don't think I'm an artist. I haven't acheived anything of value or substance here. A generous interpretation of what I (and others posting in this dedicated thread to ai generated images, and not any of the other threads on this board, a thread you can easily mute and never have to see) am doing would be similar to that one guy on the quad of your college who's pretty good at devil sticks or the diabolo: an interesting feat that means nothing, but is kinda fun to look at if you like that kind of thing. And much like that guy on the quad, you can easily ignore this. And since I don't like posting without images, here's a bunch of shit renders you can use to prove how awful AI images are.

>>1807 Absolutely, your examples right there can prove what an AI is capable and incapable of doing. double arms, tri-breasts, incorrect anatomy, double belly buttons, I just don't see it as replacing real artists in any way (Though some members of DA are upset at DA's implementation)

Im I bit worried it will satured the medium and well, die down from there.

>>1809 A reasonable concern, certainly. My main counter to that is we're in the 'new toy' phase. Since access to these tools are somewhat democratized, lots of people are playing with their new 'thing' and seeing what it does. Imagine a class of 100 kids that have just been given yoyos. (if you're of a certain age, I bet I just unlocked some memories). Some guy stood in front of them and showed off a bunch of wild tricks, and taught them all how to do a simple trick. For the next month, parents and teachers are sick to death of yoyos, since nearly all 100 kids are constantly playing with them, trying to do tricks and whatnot. But within that first month, some kids stop playing with them; tricks are too hard, they can't get the hang of the basics, it hurts their hands, whatever. in the next month, only 15 kids are still at it, congregating with each other, showing off their new rough skills. Within another month, only one or two of those kids will keep at it, as they either had a natural knack for it, or found the process of learning tricks enjoyable. By the end of the semester, no one thinks about yoyos any more except for Jimmy who's uploading yoyo tutorials on youtube as a hobby. Right now, we're in the first week of the yoyo craze. Teachers and parents represent platforms like DA and communities like this one, all trying to figure out what to do about these toys. in the right setting, they're nothing more than amusements, but can be disruptive during class (posting AI images in threads not for that, shitting up insta feeds) or can hurt other kids (people passing off generated images as art they 'made', generating art in the style of an artist). Over time, rules and processes are drafted and put in place. But overall interest will wane, reducing the need for stringent control. It's an inelegant metaphor, one that explicitly side-steps the moral implications of these AI generators and their datadets because I am not equipped to have those arguments. But these tools exist, and people will play around with them, but many will grow bored. Niche hobbyists will keep dicking around with this stuff, but I promise the ubiquity of shitty generated 'art' will slowly fade. >>1808 I've been dormant on DA for the last month or so, what implementation are you referring to?

>>1796 The response to interpreting 3D Renders has made me really fascinated and I think it highlights one of AI Artworks’s niche appeals that is peering into an alternate reality. A what if rather than something to replace.

>>1811 And by doing that I don’t want to throw our reality away.

Tried my hand at img2img with an irl model. NAI leak works well enough for this. I'm quite surprised by how well it replicates the original image compared to the normal SD model or Waifu model. Would be interesting to see if it works in reverse. I'm using NMKD's gui, settings and prompt should be in the metadata.

I understand this stuff gets a lot of hate, but this is comically bad art. Part of the reason I don't judge this art so much is because I see it comparable to the rest of the art that has always been posted here prior yo AI, but the reality is that I have read anon complain on more than one occasion about how it had been YEARS since he saw an art piece that was worth downloading be uploaded to one of these threads. So I know I am not alone when I say that literally none of this art on this site is good, a handful of it being mediocre at best. The fact that I stay mostly silent on the issue does not mean that the art I have seen here is the least bit to my liking. That is all I wanted to say. I understand the masses clearly enjoy a different aquired taste. I have no problem with them enjoying what they enjoy and to a certain extent I even welcome it, but I am also not going to pretend that it's the best when it's literal garbage; sometimes 40 or 50 year old styles garbage. I have no qualms about it as long as we can agree to call crap crap when we see it without the need to lie, decieve, or manipulate one another. I apologize and I will not comment anymore on bbwart threads. I usually stay in tits anyways and occasionally comment on booty threads.

>>1813 Have you tried any character sheets yet?

>>1814 I LOOK AT FAT ART TO CUM EVERYONE HERE IS JUST TRYING TO CUM EFFICIENTLY REAL OBESE WOMEN ARE USUALLY UGLY I JUST WANT TO TRICK MY LIZARD BRAIN INTO THINKING IM CUMMING INTO A WOMAN OF UNREASONABLE PROPORTIONS MOST FAT ART SUCKS BUT THIS IS GOOD ENOUGH

Here are some results of my experimental obese/belly model trained in DreamBooth. I used the modified NAI from China as a base. I'm on a quest to create glorious fatties with AI.

>>1814 Save this for the man baby thread you driveling retard.

something i've been kind of wondering, specifically for NovelAI, if you wanted a specific character, would it be better to enter their features manually, or can you just straight up put their name down?

Two friends have fun while eating at the restaurant!

>>1819 You can name them and if they come up in the recommended prompts then the ai will be able to make said character depending how strong the recommended prompt is

If anyone is willing to part the knowledge unto me what prompts do I have to punch in the actual novelai to get girls in this thread and what's the best method for making progressions cuz I want to fulfill some people's requests.

Should I install and learn a distro to take full advantage of my RX 5700's ROCm cores and get full utility out NovelAI, or should I spread my cheeks for a RTX card?

>>1822 I would direct you here >>1699 For progressions, either use the same seed and keep adding (((emphasis))) around a fattening term, or generate an image, put it in img2img, add more fattening terms / more emphasis. For really big, you'll need to warp the image in a photo editor and then feed it to img2img.

>>1824 What terms would you recommend I really want to get this stuff down like a charm

Some of my attempts from mucking around on the NovelAI website using various methods. It would be freakin amazing to have an easy to understand guide at how to make this shit work better more consistently. I'm willing to pay for the service, but if it's going to be as hard for me to understand as it is now I'll probs axe my subscription. That saying I'm a noob and too lazy to scroll through all these threads about it

>>1826 My brother in Christ, the best info you're gonna find is in the post linked >>1699 there, and in this one thread. It's one thread, you can read the whole thing in like thirty minutes. Faster if you skim through the requests and single sentence posts. Right now, you get better fats with the furry model +human tag, but it tends to be more unstable. If you've got the credits to burn ($10 gets you 10,000), go fishing with a handful of fat descriptors and generate a few. Find one you like? either save the seed and play around with adding {{emphasis}} (each pair of {} brackets makes that tag 'more important' to the model) to a specific tag, like {{flabby belly}}, or save the image and feed it back into the model with Upload Image. Best/more reliable results come from taking an image, roughly editing it in a image editing program and feeding it back into the model. There are no hard rules with this stuff. Experiment and find out what works. We've all shared our findings here, report back with any new discoveries.

>>1696 maybe a mod should sticky the ai thread? that way it's all contained to one thread forever? but also that would allow people to find all information about it in one place? thread 1 and thread 2 already are lost to time now it seems?

bbwchan should get a new board for AI generated shit, none of this is hand drawn or made.

>>1829 That's... That's what this whole thread is about. Do you NOT know how to read?

>>1817 looking great so far. would love to check out the finished model ive been trying to make fats with textual inversion, but mine look horrible. i want to try dreambooth but i have no idea how to get started

>>1830 maybe you should be the one learn to read you twat, im saying get a whole fucking separate section on this site for this shit. this is drawn, this shit is not drawn, so it doesnt belong here. theres enough of this cancer on this site already, it needs to go into its own seperate dumpster like the inflation and pregnancy boards.

Some thanksgiving Iowa

Some Thanksgiving Iowa

>>1833 >>1834 And it was posted twice, cool.

>>1832 It was a mod who made the first AI thread. It was pinned.

>>1836 The main purpose of a thread like this is keeping it localized there.

>>1837 I agree that it is drawn, but feel that AI art really does not require enough threads to warrant a whole category at the same time. The most I can see is a request thread, a help thread, and ones for different AIs, but I feel like one thread or two like the help one we had already does all of that. If you want to see why in my opinion a new category would be a waste, look at the state the writing category is in. I still remember when very active, friendly, and broadly helpful writing advice thread that was here got sent there and almost immediately died.

>>1838 I meant I agree that it is not drawn. I said the opposite by mistake making it look like I disagreed.

>>1838 agreed. there is barely enough demand for a second thread, let alone a whole other board. and people like it, plus its not any less deserving of a spot here than the deviantart circle tool OCs that get posted

>>1832 Both Inflation and Furridom even beyond BBW are as categories broad, with both there are a ton different venues to take from regardless of your opinion on them. AI Art meanwhile, is that simple. I don’t know what’s the point of making a thread dedicated to one fandom when the interest is as simple as the fact it is AI Art. And AI Art I feel like is only really guided by us rather than made by anyone. Better With Salt has a thread because there is a community to be fostered there. There is only one Salt. Novel AI can be anyone.

>>1841 Meaning community is of the AI, keeping it isolated.

>>1842 That is not to say people can’t foster communities or stakes of their own through it, but that these communities I feel will end up with more in common than separate. That overlap in my opinion is a unique aspect of the novelty that is AI Art. That being one that sets it apart.

although ill be real... another thread or two for ass&tits would be nice

I’m wondering how Novel AI would apply a softer face and tum to this one. Maybe arms.

>>1845 not very well, apparently

>>1846 For the attempt thank you. I was hoping the angle would have lended to straight forwardness. Turns out that was not the case, I agree.

>>1838 You're literally in a thread that's being filled with content. The last one locked at 1000. What the fuck are you talking about. I think the ranting thread is up again, go check that out.

here are some of my best results

Recently bought NovelAI last night and started using it for quite some time, its pretty fun and easy to use. Here are some AI pics that I made today.

still very difficult to coax good fats from the model. i am using stablediffusion and ive noticed the following gives better results: img2img on fat artwork or crude edits a small descriptive sentence like "very fat woman standing with big belly" along with the rest of your tags avoid using "obese", "huge belly", or "gigantic belly"- they make the bellies very round and spherical, without any rolls or details avoid using "bbw" and "ssbbw" - they dont really do anything "belly focus" is good sometimes but may create weird lumpy bellies avoid "skindentation"- tends to merge the breasts and belly together. "navel" and "belly button" on the negative tags sometimes produces better bellies. play with it "flabby belly" is a godsend and should always be emphasized at least once. "fat rolls", "belly rolls", and "big belly" are also pretty good "plump" is good as well, especially with emphasis, but sometimes invokes a shitty art style or will actually make bellies smaller. play with it merging the hyper ass model with a normal model of course lets you generate huge asses, but also makes girls generally wider and makes bellies larger

>>1852 and of course wider image resolutions make wider girls

>>1848 Content that is fine being here? Imagine if there was an entire category instead of one source thread.

>>1854 Or two, if you count the archival thread lost art.

Dropping the good stuff I got since when the thing first hyped

Trained a model based mainly on my favorite artists (you might be able to recognize the creators). No img2img necessary. It's pretty accurate to the point that this definitely seems like some kind of violation, so I'll be keeping this one for myself I think. But I thought you should know it is possible.

>>1857 That's interesting. Can you tell me what this is supposed to be for? Is it supposed to look dead and lifeless? Can you tell it to make a hentai scene?

>>1858 you sound like youre about to quit

>>1859 Okay, but what does what you said mean?

>>1860 That you should kill yourself, dumbass.

>>1861 Okay? Why should I do that, idiot?

>>1857 JESUS CHRIST this is good... right when i gave up on training my embed cause it spits out picrel id kill to get this or at the very least train one myself is this dreambooth or text inversion or hypernetwork? what are your params and sample size?

I’m hoping Novel AI will some day allow generations in exchange for watching ads or something. If more people had access to it, I feel like there wouldn’t be as much fear surrounding it.

>>1864 doubt it will ever happen. the fraction of a cent they make off of the user watching an ad would not come close to covering the costs of generating an image but whats your gpu & operating system? if you have a modern-ish computer you could just run the NAI model offline

>>1863 This was done by merging the model I made with the Chinese NovelAi clone, Anything-V3.0 at a 50:50 ratio. I used the Dreambooth extension that can be added to the webui. There are tutorials online on how to get it working correctly and how to use it. You may have to update Visual Studio if you're using Windows so Stable Diffusion can import pytorch and torchvision. This model was trained with 470 images with a roughly consistent style for 47000 steps, 100 steps per image seems to work well, anecdotally. Also about 2000 class images. Class images don't need to be a consistent style, just digital art. Went to bed while it cooked my 3090 for about 8 hours and that was it. Without merging the models it gives rougher images but decent body shapes. So the Anything model kinda works like a cleanup or a big anime hypernetwork. Specific parameters don't matter as much since the model will bias toward fat shapes anyway, but here's the prompts for the Miku pic: Euler a, 30 steps, CFG Scale: 11 1girl, ((hatsune miku)), vocaloid, ((blue hair)), long hair, thighhighs, pantyhose, smile, white shirt, tank top, sleeveless, standing, fat rolls, belly, (((obese))), (((fat))), nsfw, thick thighs, round face, fat rolls, fat arms, midriff, big belly, tight clothes, gold bracelets, beach background, beach, sand, ocean, palm trees, tree, clouds, sky, food, holding food Negative prompts are just the usual low quality, bad anatomy, etc I've had some luck training embeddings for specific characters, and it seems plausible you could get similar results to this with a big enough hypernetwork, but the Dreambooth method seems to be the best for shape and style training from what I've seen and read. Good luck

https://note.com/4m4m1_/n/n8bb0eb792490 https://www.deviantart.com/zachsano/art/AI-belly-art-keywords-Belly-size-chart-939170401

https://www.reddit.com/r/FatHentaiAI/ New subreddit for this kind of art. I think you gentlemen will enjoy. https://www.reddit.com/r/FatHentaiAI/

>>1857 >I'll be keeping this one for myself while I don't agree with keeping models/prompts/tips to yourself, I can't really make you share it since you trained it yourself. It's a bummer because there haven't been any models/embeddings shared for fat related art (that I'm aware of), so the rest of us are stuck twisting existing ones into pretzels and praying to RNGesus that we don't get flesh piles. If you aren't interested in sharing that model, then would you be willing to train one more generically on different sizes (like chubby through obese blobs/immobile)? I have thousands of pics tagged in my local hydrus but since I'm a gpulet, I can't train anything myself

>>1737 cheers >>1720 moose's hair antlers are proving to be difficult lol

>>1866 Nice work. I also have been training some models on Dreambooth based on my favorite artists. <br> <br> I have two questions about your workflow if possible.<br> 1) Did you train the text encoder during your long training session? <br> 2) Did you handpick your class images from the web or generate them using the China NAI base model for your model using a class like &apos;digital art or obese&apos;?<br> <br> Some of my workflow for people interested:<br> I used Shivam&apos;s Dreambooth with a GTX 1080Ti on Linux. Nerdy Rodent has a nice guide on that.<br> <br> I&apos;ve been using a specific class like &apos;belly&apos;, generated images with the Chinese NAI for class data (800 or so), and then gathered training data that has a focus on bellies, specifically works of my favorite artists. However, I had to edit the training data such as removing backgrounds or any odd details becaues Dreambooth likes to pick up these things in the finalized model. My results in shown above are 7-8 images with about 800 steps (images * 100 steps). I also trained the text encoder.

Nice work. I also have been training some models on Dreambooth based on my favorite artists. I have two questions about your workflow if possible. 1) Did you train the text encoder during your long training session? 2) Did you handpick your class images from the web or generate them using the China NAI base model for your model using a class like (digital art or obese)? Some of my workflow for people interested: I used Shivam's Dreambooth with a GTX 1080Ti on Linux. Nerdy Rodent has a nice guide on that. I've been using a specific class like 'belly', generated images with the Chinese NAI for class data (800 or so), and then gathered training data that has a focus on bellies, specifically works of my favorite artists. However, I had to edit the training data such as removing backgrounds or any odd details becaues Dreambooth likes to pick up these things in the finalized model. My results in shown above are 7-8 images with about 800 steps (images * 100 steps). I also trained the text encoder.

>>1873 Those are some decent looking results. I'd be interested to see more like this. No, I didn't do any additional training of the text encoder. It's able to generate the images using only the standard prompts like "belly", "obese" and "midriff", etc. Training the encoder does seem like it would be very helpful if you wanted to generate "blob" or "immobile" type fats as others seem interested in since the encoder has no knowledge of these terms. That's never really been my taste, but that's how I'd go about it. For the class images, I just used 2000 images from my local folder of fat art in a bunch of different styles (not handpicked per se, but it's still art I like) and gave it the class prompt "digital art of a fat girl". If my understanding is correct, the exact subject of class images shouldn't matter as much as the type of image, ie, "digital art", and "girl", as opposed to "photograph" or "man". But it may help a little that it was fat art, I'll admit I'm not exactly sure. Either way, there should be no problem generating the class images yourself. This is the second time I've tried training a model like this and I believe the main difference was the quality and consistency of the training images. The first time I used art from many more artists that was in differing styles, and it couldn't produce the same quality output. Limiting the training to 3 or 4 artists that I really like seems to be what made the difference. Since the images have to be cropped to 512x512, getting a good mix of face, belly and thighs in the training set seems to have helped too.

Hot Spring Fox Spirit 1/2

>>1875 Hot Spring Fox Spirit 2/2

I saw these floating around.

Here are some of my tries. Is there any advice on the tags to avoid blurry nipples?

i trained two models in dreambooth- one locally for 1.4k steps over 5 hours (cpu-only mode is slow as fuck but i dont have the vram to put it on my gpu), and another in 6k steps over one hour using the dreambooth colab. the first four images come from the local training. the last three come from the colab training i assume the disparity comes from how i accidentally overtrained the colab model and had to merge it to get anything usable. the local model didnt need merging (but does need luck- i got these images with a lot of luck and inpainting) ill play with both some more and see if i can get something better also >>1875 >>1876 fantastic post

>>1879 forgot the last image

>>1871 In my opinion, someone on Twitter, @Santaroumikan, managed an impressive Ezo, although it seems like it hasn’t reached a stage of being consistent.

>>1881 It turns out their Pixiv has this resource documenting their experiences. https://www.pixiv.net/novel/show.php?id=18702469

I like making these...

>>1874 Thank you for sharing your wisdom. Here's some more fatties from my model.

>>1884 That first one looks like you used one of Kurocaze's artworks as the reference.

>>1883 This is fucking dope

fat bea pokemons

>>1887 >03362-646818324-masterpiece, best quality, belly, (bbw_belly_1), (sweat_0.8), school uniform.png) What word do you use ? And do you use "Undesired Content" ?

>>1887 Trained on, or referencing miraclerun. The fifth picture in particular looks traced.