>>3799 So uh, how's this going for ya? Getting a lot of good boys liking it?

>>4134 Actually good! Got a little bit of a harem of good boys (and girl) in my discord <3

>>4140 pity the fool

fuck off

Alright chief. Lemme be honest here. I respect the hustle. The fact you have 20 patrons on Patreon already is impressive. At the same time, this shit is painfully generic. It's also lazy. For the love of god, the next post, you damn well better inpaint out the pseudo-vagina armpits, or this thread is getting nuked. And, look, I'm sure you're comfy with the particular style, but geezums petes try more. Anything. New lighting, new anatomy, new scenes, new scenarios, new loras, new vaes, anything. This shit just blends together after 3 images.

I've gotta say that I agree with the General on this, and I was thinking that he was instead going to complain about the grossly over-abundant non transexual penises, but he didn't.

>>5956 It actually is funny you should mention all of that, since it is stuff that I have already implemented. My last two posts worth of content are wildly different than previous. Things like new Loras, randomized prompts that affect lighting and style. Yeah, the armpits bother me too. But like, is it a rule or something that makes you get to delete things you personally don't like? I don't mean to be an ass, but that doesn't strike me as fair. Personally I don't plan on painting anything. If an image is good, I'll use it. Id rather spend all night generating images and using my scripts to easily sift through and reduce the pool of usable images than spend time painfully fixing art.

>>5963 >wildly different than previous brugh I think we have wildy different opionions on what constitues "wildly different". I would say if anything, the changes in the recent posts are mild iterations at best. >Yeah, the armpits bother me too. But like, is it a rule or something that makes you get to delete things you personally don't like? No, but I own the site, and I get to do what I want. Thing is, I don't usually take a personal stance on things like this. Like I said, I respect the hustle and thats why I've allowed this blatant advertisement for another site in the first place. What it comes down to is, it comes off as vanilla dime-store visual novela steam trash, you aren't providing prompts / settings (not that anyone is asking), and the sheer "idgaf" about the vaginas creeping out of armpts while at the same time having the gall to charge for such things (that was made freely with open-source tech), really rubs me the wrong way. If the next post shows substantial improvement / effort, I'll let you keep having your free advertisement thread that no one seems interested in, but really, do better.

>>5964 This seems entirely subjective, but I agree because such is art, and also love. I know because I've been in love before. It was beautiful.

>>5964 Is this any better? This is all just your opinion, just elitist holier-than-thou bullshit. An opinion that I don't really care for, considering the ratio of people who enjoy my "artwork" vs a few smoothbrains on some wannabe imageboard.

>>5969 Definitely an improvement. I touched it up a little bit to match your style, hope you don't mind. >considering the ratio of people who enjoy my "artwork" vs a few smoothbrains on some wannabe imageboard. Brother, you've been posting here for month, with not a single positive comment or meaningful interaction, but YOU ARE STILL HERE. Who's the smoothbrain?

>>5970 bruh you put more effort into that than i would like 20 of my images... And the rejects bin is in the $6 tier now <3

>>5970 Also you make it out like this is the only place that exists. My guy, go look at my facebook page or twitter and see how many people enjoy my works.

>>5972 No, that's not what I'm saying. It's not a contest. I'm saying that here, no one cares. Not one person has asked what model you use. Not one anon has queried your prompts. Not one soul has asked for a catbox. Do you know why? Because we were all making this generic big-boob classic anime girl stuff 6 months ago. It's old hat. On top of that, you're being lazy about it, as you admitted yourself. When I open an image an the first thing my eyes and brain are drawn to is a strangely red "did they just shave or is something else happening there" thing, that's not a good advertisement. Any good businessman would have screened them and not posted them. In fact, if you hadn't KEPT posting lazy ass shit-em-out-and-forget-em "artwork" with ghost snatches under every tricep, we wouldn't be having this beef. Listen, my criticism may have been a little harsh, but the first thing you need to learn (if you aren't going to learn to not post lazy half assed generations that could have been screened out or in-painted) is that you can't let criticism get to you, as it obviously has. Your art isn't for me (or apparently anyone here) and that's fine. But you don't seem to want any comments unless it's praise, and that's not a good place to be.

>>5974 I understand, at that point it's a matter of subjective opinion. The armpits really don't look bad to me. If you have a difference of opinion, thats fine. I really don't mind it. The criticism hasn't gotten to me like you might think. I more take issue with unhelpful things like "vanilla dime-store visual novella steam trash". You're just trying to be insulting. Personally I just disagree. Perhaps you're just a harsher critic who finds enjoyment out of different things. That's fine.

>>5975 Let me ask you this, if someone did ask for your prompts / models / workflow, would you give it to them? All I was really saying is that your generations which don't feature the pit-creatures are fine, if bland. I can see you at least did try some sex positions loras lately, so good on you. It's just that for someone trying to make money off this, not taking the extra 30 seconds to fix imperfections comes off as "why would I support this". > I more take issue with unhelpful things like "vanilla dime-store visual novella steam trash". You're just trying to be insulting. You can take it as an insult but man, it's just kinda facts. Look at any gacha game on the app store. Look at all the visual novelas on steam. Your art is their art. It's the same kind. It's streamlined. It's efficient. It's factory-floor, assembly line stuff. It's serviceable. It's fine. For the casual observer who can wank in 15 seconds, it might even be more than enough to get the job done. But it doesn't stand out, it doesn't have it's own identity. The faces and Ahegao expressions and poses are the things we men have seen in every sex game ad, every meme game on steam, every dime-store manga for 20+ years merged into one homogeneous, vague e-homunculus. I might even go so far as to say it's the epitome of why some people hate A.I. art, but, as you said, this is all subjective.

>>5977 Yeah I don't necessarily disagree with you. I could spend a lot more time and effort fixing imperfections in the art. I understand that with a comparison of a single piece of my art to a single piece of someone elses, the other will win. However for every one of theirs, I'm releasing 10-20. And YES, I know that is the criticism you're making... That's fine. I actually don't disagree with your saying it's streamlined, factory-floor whatever... That's like... exactly what I'm going for! Yeah, I think your standards for what you find exciting or interesting is just a lot higher. This is kind of a phenomenon I've noticed in other areas of my life. I don't mean to like, derail this conversation or anything... But like, i very rarely see a movie and dislike it... no matter what it is. Critics can rate shit as 1/5 or whatever, but I'll still enjoy it. I think critics have a lot of higher standards. Whereas every day people really don't care and can enjoy things a lot easier. Either that or I'm just the weird one for enjoying everything so easily, and it's normal to dislike things easier. I dunno, at this point it's becoming more of a philosophical thing. I kind of expected to get banned straight away but now this discussion has become interesting. Now that i think about it, maybe i really could take the images that I make that I would have released anyway... and inpaint some stuff to make them better. Either way theyre still the same boring shit to you right? Just less vagina-pits.

>>5979 >Yeah, I think your standards for what you find exciting or interesting is just a lot higher. Fascinating phenomenon really. If I put myself into the shoes of a much younger man who's jacked off to much less porn, I could easily see myself getting off on art very much like this. If you have a small pool of things you've been exposed to, most definitely you have a lower ceiling of standards. >This is kind of a phenomenon I've noticed in other areas of my life. I don't mean to like, derail this conversation or anything... But like, i very rarely see a movie and dislike it... no matter what it is. Critics can rate shit as 1/5 or whatever, but I'll still enjoy it. I think critics have a lot of higher standards. Whereas every day people really don't care and can enjoy things a lot easier. Either that or I'm just the weird one for enjoying everything so easily, and it's normal to dislike things easier. I dunno, at this point it's becoming more of a philosophical thing. There is a reason bland fast food still sells. For the average consumer, it's all they need. Would they like better? Sure, but they are hungry NOW. So they eat it. And it's not bad enough to complain (usually), but not good enough to be excited for. It's food. You eat it, you go home, you forget about it. And billions of dollars were made. >I kind of expected to get banned straight away but now this discussion has become interesting. Little point in it since vpns are cheap, besides, this board is supposed to be people helping each other learn. >maybe i really could take the images that I make that I would have released anyway... and inpaint some stuff to make them better. Either way theyre still the same boring shit to you right? Just less vagina-pits. The most creative you've been so far is glasses and a hard hat. I'd say you could use some practice with in-painting, regardless if you end up posting the results or not. It's a good skill to have, and you'll get quick enough with it eventually it won't feel like a burden to do. Will make yours gens much more professional, varied, and visually appealing once you get the hang of it.

>>5982 I like that analogy! The fast food of porn. I mean, you can have all the gourmet cuisine you want... sometimes a shitty mcDonald's is what you crave! I might give inpainting a shot with works that are like 95% of the way. I figured out a way it could potentially work in my workflow. >>5982