>>21451
> You got a guide somewhere as to how you clean up your results?
not really .
most of the cleanup 'process' i've learned has just come from playing around with the settings a bunch over many images until i learned what they did
i recommend the same, because no single workflow will work for every image, you need to get a feel for the settings and do things off-the-cuff
i was supposed to make a little guide a while ago, but i didn't think i'd be covering anything that wasn't already covered by someone else (probably better, too), and most of my advice boils down to 'try new things often', so i gave up
but, generally, an image would usually go:
> gen something neat
> upscale on 0.6~ denoise on 2x or 2.25x upscale.
> if the upscale keeps fucking up the image, use img2img instead
> inpaint the things that already look alright on a reasonable (0.4-0.55) denoise, on a reasonably high resolution (at least half of what your image is), with the settings 'masked only' and 'padding: 256'. this often just makes things (esp faces) straight-up better easily. i will usually go over everything- clothes, belly, face, legs, etc, at least once
> really ugly or stubborn things get higher denoise (0.5-0.7) & higher prompt emphasis
> if necessary, crudely draw out or draw in things in photoshop, then change the prompt to include/exclude them, and inpaint them on varying desnoises til they look nice. this is especially handy for things like clothes, genitals, errors, grabby hands, additional subjects
> for extra credit, use the sd upscale script on 1.25x-1.5x on .2-.4 denoise, and inpaint away any weirdness
and, this isn't really related to cleanup, but don't be afraid to look at other people's image data to try and learn. also, don't be afraid of using a lora, or multiple loras. there's one for damn near everything
i see some people get weirdly hung up on it before proceeding to prompt something impossible without one