>>43968
>This is just wooplus
Lord forgive me but this is 100% what everyone going onto Woo should've expected if the current state of their ad campaign is anything to go by. I have no bearing for what it was like when it was "good" (if it was ever) years back, but it's a swipe app at the end of the day, and those don't work for 99% of the guys on swipe apps, let alone fat ones who fell for the "plus-size dating* site" grift again. There's also too many goddamn bots for guys who actually wanna make an attempt, and most of my communication via Woo is raw, unfiltered hate speech towards Telegram scammers. You still can't do anything in the communal feed without getting hit by the same bots from last year somehow
>>43964
Judging from the AI emails re: the bot menace, everything about the site is fake, the performative verification when signing-up is exactly that, everything is handled by pajeets using AI
My 1-year anniversary review is this: It's a scamware Bumble with a userbase that's basically Feabie, but swap SSRI's with meth and alcohol. The moment they started appearing in ad blocks alongside fake dating apps like Hily and Boo was when I knew this was truly another pajeetware app, and the broken English into obvious AIspeak everywhere is another. As I mentioned earlier, all ads are overly sexual where OF models are the spokesgorls if your social media pegs you as "male; coomer", and considering the bulk of their ads were on Tiktok and IG, the algorithm knows which tags you're looking at
When they were testing the waters for a male spotlight event like the last OF spotlight, the overwhelming response was
>lol, lmao
at their failure to read the room circa the failure of making dad bods a thing. If shit isn't working out on the normal dating apps, it's going to be even worse for you on Woo, because the single moms and models are on here because this is the primary ad social media flagged as "female; slightly-chubby and above and/or egirl" got