/bbwdraw/ - BBW Drawn

Thougts on DQ VII's remaster?

>>276624 First thought was why does this look like Snack World but my second thought, which wasn't really a thought and more of me bursting out in laughter, was when I realized they used "reimagine" instead of "remake"; webm related. Sucks it won't really cause much of any new Maribel fat art.

>>276624 Mixed feelings, but it looks better than DQM3 or Treasures at least. The 3DS version was also kind of ugly so it'll probably top that. I expect the battle and job systems to be improved but the "streamlined" story to be worse somehow. >>276629 >Sucks it won't really cause much of any new Maribel fat art. True, unfortunately. Maribel was made to be a ball of lard.

>>276640 >The 3DS version was also kind of ugly so it'll probably top that The 3DS version also was made before Squeenix started pandering to western sensibilities to the point of censoring even Toriyama of all people. That being said, the detailed eye sockets, really screws up the cuteness that DQVIIs style had. https://inv.nadeko.net/watch?v=65dYbItP9Ks https://inv.nadeko.net/watch?v=kbc83XGqTHw >the "streamlined" story to be worse somehow I thought they already cut that down with the 3DS entry. >Maribel was made to be a ball of lard One nice thing about DQIX, was the ability to dress your characters up like the main characters from all the other games at the time. Good for imagining your character leading a party of 3 of your favorites on an adventure that slowly devolves into most of the time venturing through dungeons, being using hands and magic to squeeze every member of the party through. Thinking about it, has anyone even used the cursed items in DQ, for WG?

>>276650 The main characters in the 3DS version looked better than the new doll versions but the NPCs had off-putting bootleg designs and the overworld zones had awful pop-in. It's the ugliest main DQ game, maybe alongside SNES 5 and 1&2, or 9 if you emulate it and bump up the resolution. >I thought they already cut that down with the 3DS entry. They've got influencer types talking about the story being more approachable or streamlined or something, which could just mean it's got the changes from the 3DS version or that it's totally different. Who knows. >has anyone even used the cursed items in DQ, for WG? I can't think of any that aren't just armor or weapons you can't take off. I read a story once about a girl needing to gain weight to burst out of cursed armor but it wasn't DQ-related.

>>276654 >It's the ugliest main DQ game, maybe alongside SNES 5 and 1&2, or 9 if you emulate it and bump up the resolution >9 >if you emulate it and bump up the resolution Please tell me you meant "unless you emulate it and bump up the resolution". >They've got influencer types talking about the story being more approachable or streamlined or something Oh shit, why is it every time DQVII gets thrown out again, they always do something that keeps me from buying it? >Who knows Easy bets are on it being something that fans won't like. >I can't think of any that aren't just armor or weapons you can't take off It doesn't need to just be that; the knowledge that there are curses can be used to put out a cursed anything; take the equip lock and piggyback another curse of WG on it, and put it on a ring or slip on bracelet but make sure its made of orichalcum so when she gets to the church and have the curse of equip removed, her finger or arm will be too fat to remove the item that's pretty much unbreakable, while the unknown secondary curse of fattening is still active.

>>276658 Toriyama villains are flat out unpleasant to be around. His heroes dress in very drab clothing because he's from Nagoya which is more unsophisticated than Tokyo

>>276658 >Please tell me you meant "unless you emulate it and bump up the resolution". Maybe I've only seen it done with terrible settings, but upscaled DQ9 always seems to look bad. It makes the 3D characters clash even worse with the sprite NPCs, and they're just not detailed enough to look good that way. Also to be clear I was only slandering the 3DS version of 7, the PS1 original still looks great. >put it on a ring or slip on bracelet Great scenario for Maribel, Maya or Red.

>>276645 >Second pic This is exactly why monster vocations were cut in Reimagined

Squenix is firing faggots and woke acolytes, possibly the currynigger responsible for trannyfying III HD

>>284026 That's great news, but this is the fat girl place

>>160128 Please give me more

Squeenix threw out the demo to the DQVII remake; anyone tried it out?

Freshly finished delivery from the drawthread. >>291706 No thanks. 1+2 were a pleasant surprise, but everything about 7R is off-putting.

>>291754 Looking real good anon, thanks. I wonder what's gonna happen with that Chrono Trigger remake they announced and did fuck all for

>>291754 Is it just me or the Pixiv welll has really dried up lately? How do people even find good art on Xitter?

>>293595 >I wonder what's gonna happen with that Chrono Trigger remake they announced and did fuck all for You say that like like Squeenix isn't hurting for cash and will ignore an easy nostalgia cow. >>295936 DQ hasn't had a new game in about a decade and remakes/remasters rarely get much if anything produced, and the Japs were already terrible with DQ Fat production. >How do people even find good art on Xitter Randomly jumping between peoples accounts by their comments.

damn, is there seriously no fat art of aishe around? you'd think there'd be at least something of her bellydancing

>>297910 Be the change you want to see in the world and charge people to make some. >>297874 >DQ hasn't had a new game in about a decade and remakes/remasters rarely get much if anything produced, and the Japs were already terrible with DQ Fat production. Squeenix is way too complacent and just putting all their eggs in the FF7 basket. I don't think they're even the kings of JRPGs anymore. >>284026 Wokies were honestly the least of their problems, their games are now all or nothing. No more reasonably priced smaller games to fill the gaps left by the deluxe editions like in the past.

>>300688 >Squeenix is way too complacent and just putting all their eggs in the FF7 basket Nah, they're learning their lesson from their current failure of an existence like every other company, it's why they're so focused on remakes and remasters to the point that DQ actually got 3. >I don't think they're even the kings of JRPGs anymore How do you just think? My money is on either Atlus or Falcom being seen as the top dog but I don't know if there's any company actually deserving of the crown. >No more reasonably priced smaller games to fill the gaps left by the deluxe editions like in the past I'm just happy Squeenix at least has the sense to not tack on the extra 10-30 bucks everyone else is doing while also heavily milking DLC money, and that they take their DRM off after a couple months.

>>300688 >>301034 They have been putting out new games in some of their B tier series like SaGa, Mana, Valkyrie Profile and Star Ocean, the problem is they're charging full price for obviously budget games.

>>301034 >it's why they're so focused on remakes and remasters to the point that DQ actually got 3 It reeks of insecurity, they're basically just exploiting the goodwill of their hardcore fans and the few people who still care about old franchises. I've seen videos of poor saps who own loads of Dragon Quest merch who're just excited of getting morself of the franchise. >My money is on either Atlus or Falcom Frankly, the only RPG that has left any impression on people lately has been Clair Obscure. >>301206 Once again, the problem is the customers. People are just okay with spending that much cash for subpar stuff, so if you're unwilling to do the same you're SOL and can only really play romhacks or indies.

>>303255 DQ has been a completely stagnant franchise. The main series has barely changed at all in the decades its existed so the only people who care anymore are hardcore autists who are deathly afraid of things changing

>>304319 Maybe they could innovate by doing a DMC clone like Final Fantasy, or a Dragon Quest Builders spiritual successor like Pokemon.

>>304319 The spinoffs are actually quite fun. I guess the issue is that it will be forever impossible to recapture the same spirit of immagination and innovation that the big three of DQ could come up with when they were given the creative freedom to do so.

DQXII has finally had a trailer that shows off some of its characters and a surprise Dragon Quest Monsters 4 with what looks like Bianca and Nera being the protags.

>>308678 Ooooooh fuck yeah Maribel

>>309646 Anyone got the remake of he did of this?

>>309646 Hopefully they'll add even more food-based monsters.

don't think I've seen anyone post this image of Meena and Maya from Expo Atom Mass yet so here https://twitter.com/ExponentialMass/status/1526004349943439360 >>166388 here's a link to the original HQ image broski https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/112013247#11 I first tried to use jpegoptim losslessly (does lossless optim by default: jpegoptim.exe "dir/path/filename.jpg") but I only got an 8.39% optimization from 24.5 to 22.4 MB! So here's the image shrunk down to 5.27 MB using lossy compression (quality 90) via jpegoptim instead. Just for posterity though I uploaded the lossless-optimized JPEG here if anyone wants it: https://files.catbox.moe/1a0vac.jpg

>>309661 That is the single ugliest piece of shit that poorfag knock off of ridiculouscake has ever drawn, and the poor sap who bought that comm deserves his money back

>>309646 I am not as blackpilled on DQXII, I don't mind the MC looking like that and the medieval-futuristic aesthetic. Probably works better than the grimdark approach they were gonna go for. By the by, has Pixiv deleted a bunch of fat art for you guys too, or did the artists move elsewhere? I swear there used to be more. >>311275 Now there's a good lad

>>160128 Thread's back, with a vengeance

>>311275 anon here who posted the 2nd image, I am sad to report that this is unfortunately inflation and not really weight gain (based on what I saw in chandelar-witch's currently inactive fanbox) making amends by posting the remake of this the artist(?) recently posted on /d/ >>309646

>>315828 I mean, it says "fat inflation" right on the image. Is there even a distinction between that and weight gain besides I guess body shape?