>>82771
Your goalposts shift every time you respond. It'd be funny, if it weren't so sad.
>I'm condemning you for being a life-ruination enabler
Quit the melodrama, get off your high horse and engage with me on at least a rational, honest level, will you? All you're doing with this self righteous, evangelical crap is embarrassing yourself.
>wailing twitter mob, "triggered"
Sorry, I thought you said 2015 died several years ago? More hypocrisy.
> You are legitimately drunk on twitter propaganda kool aid, and you cannot read.
And yet you still haven't engaged with, or refuted that point. You haven't told me what it is that makes a maid costume inherently "feminine", or what that even means, probably because you don't have an answer. You're probably getting so mad because cognitive dissonance is beginning to set in and your mind is lashing out at the very suggestion that it might be wrong.
>Diabetes medication doesn't lead to irreparable self harm, alienation, nor suicide.
Neither does HRT. What causes self harm, alienation and suicide is being treated like a second class citizen for daring to try and be happy.
>Citation
>The WHO adds that transgender people often experience disproportionately high levels of mental health conditions.
>They note that cissexism, discrimination, violence, and barriers to healthcare can all contribute to the increased chance of mental health concerns.
Yes. These are all external factors. Like I said, being treated like shit by others for being transgender is what causes high rates of mental health issues, not being transgender itself.
>It also highlights that more than half of transgender and non-binary youth have seriously considered suicide. Of the respondents, 29% had attempted suicide. A 2021 articleTrusted Source notes that factors such as barriers to care, victimization, and cissexism.
29? Golly, isn't that a smaller number than 41?
A 12% decrease over 6 years. Thanks for making my argument for me.
For someone who's telling me that I apparently don't know how to read, it's kinda hilarious that you've linked an article that's proven me right.
>>82772
>you might genuinely have an IQ of 89.
Or alternatively, I understand basic Saussurean principles of Semiotics. Easy mistake to make if you're a total reprobate.