/gen/ - General Discussion

talk about whatever you like

BBW-Chan is supported by simple text or static image ads from a-ads.com.
Please consider whitelisting us in your adblocker if you enjoy your stay!


Mode: Reply
Name
Subject
Message

Max message length: 0/9999

Files

Max file size: 10.00 MB

Max files: 6

Captcha
More

READ THE *RULES* BEFORE YOU POST!

[ / / / / ]

The pure feederism PlumpyCake 03/13/2025 (Thu) 03:38:34 Id:bd8c9e No. 61823 >>62340 >>62775 >>62819
I have great news, after a few months I finally managed to create my philosophical proposal and objective path on feederism! I don't speak English, but it could be translated. Pure feederism is not just an interpretation of feederism—it is its only true and coherent form. Feederism, by definition, is the unrestricted pursuit of weight gain, with immobility as its ultimate goal. Any attempt to introduce limits, moderation, or the possibility of reversal contradicts the very essence of the movement. If feederism is to exist as a structured philosophy and practice, it must be absolute. Vulgar feederism, on the other hand, is a distorted, diluted version—a product of individuals who enjoy certain aspects of weight gain but refuse to commit to its full logical progression. This misinterpretation has led to confusion, weakening the term and allowing it to be mixed with irrelevant fetishes and fleeting whims. Pure feederism is not a preference; it is a necessity. If feederism is to maintain its integrity, there can be no compromises, no hesitation, and no room for retreat. This book is not just a guide—it is a declaration. A defense of pure feederism against dilution and misrepresentation. A call to commitment, structure, and unwavering devotion to the path of absolute growth. The PDF is here: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1YpSkExf_7xRCjQXF5fP-PSrvtuIs6Eqj?usp=sharing
It has already been translated
>>61823 more like pure autism, amiright
>>62340 Yep pseudo intellectual philosophical nonsense and ironically is as dogmatic as the very ideas it seeks to repudiate.
>>62340 Yeah, i'm autistic. Next question?...
>>62401 If you're going to be all controlled disagreement, you better SHUT THE HELL UP. If you're not going to propose anything and just criticize, then you should reconsider using your fingers when writing so much shit about others <3
Maybe I missed it, but why is immobility the logical goal and not death by fat? I’m no death feedist, and I certainly prefer the former to death, but it seems like death would arguably be an even more extreme version of gaining. Is it your point that since you claim that the idea of extreme obesity causing health issues is based on misconceptions, then that is not necessarily a conclusion anyone can reach?
>>62451 Two fetishes. One is the immobility as BDSM, powerlessness, humiliation and lack of consent. Other is decay/rot fetish: destroying and debasing the pretty, female, etc. the fetish is disgust and destruction.
>>62420 Oh please I read all fifty seven pages of your drivel, knew it was a stupid manifesto you don't give a damn about discourse you were just horny and wanted to write some philosophical wordsalad as a circle jerk. It took a minute to write that last comment, stay mad then. Another stupid thread.
The entire text is a joke, using circular logic and terrible reasoning. First off why are you trying to make feedism a quasi religion ? The entire point of feedism is a rebellion against harmful societal norms and the embrace of growth and nurturing, Placing strict roles and gate keeping in the manner described is stupid and hypocritical. Why is immobility the only endpoint ? Why do I have to be immobile to embrace fatness ? Laughably unrealistic and stupid. Pure nonsense, oh and nice work using real world philosophy to try and ground your dogma only to fail to actually use this principles correctly. You rail against "hostile fetishes" but your entire manifesto was written in such a hostile elitist tone that makes us look like a bunch of losers pretending to be profound. Nah you can keep this barely coherent poorly written piece of horny trash. Reddit philosophers could write better argued points than you and even then at least it is open to interpretation. Your own dogmatic goals are so stupidly out of touch and you miss the entire point of the fetish. Even ignoring the philosophical blunders, dude we are on a fat pirate porn board. Sure I'm just as bad as you for writing this essay but damn this is stupid all around. You like fat girls, I like fat girls, we want to make them fatter, this thread is stupid, your work is dumber and I'm done with this thread have a nice day.
>>61823 don't listen to them OP. you're having fun and they're being fags. i find what you're doing here vaguely amusing. guess i'll check out your pdf too at some point lol
>>62775 Eh gotta give him credit for trying.
>>61823 immobility contradicts your own beliefs. you list certain "hostile" fetishes that are a near guarantee with immobility. Immobility itself is a separate kink, limits are part of a healthy relationship which clearly you've never been in. Feederism in a relationship is a very intimate form of love and appreciation of the body, this does not make going to the gym or weight loss a complete rejection of that love. Your attempt to set a clear definition is both pretentious, contradictory and based in your own preferences.

Show forms
Quick Reply
Drag files to upload or
click here to select them
No cookies?
Extra