/bbfurries/ - BB Furries

Fat foxes, rotund rabbits, and porky pigs


Mode: Reply

  • Allowed file types: GIF, JPG, PNG, WebM, OGG, ZIP and more
  • Maximum number of files per post: 6
  • Maximum file size per post: 10.00 MB
Captcha no cookies?
Read the rules before you post. file limits
Advanced (canvas, flags, deletion)
Drawing: × size canvas
(For post deletion)
[ Index / Catalog / Bottom / Logs / RSS ]

Anonymous No. 111606
My Little Pony general Previous MLP threads: >>13 >>36921 https://web.archive.org/web/20230511192619/https://bbw-chan.nl/bbfurries/res/13.html https://web.archive.org/web/20230511192619/https://bbw-chan.nl/bbfurries/res/36921.html
>R9K prevented at least one of your files from being posted.
>>111625 That typically happens when you try to post an image that's already been posted somewhere on the board, yeah.
>>111627 > try to post an image that's already been posted somewhere on the board, yeah. This is the dumbest thing I have seen.

Open file 1.19 MB, 4096x3176

Open file 774.22 KB, 4096x2602
>>111628 Please send all your questions and complaints to Barclay >>/gen/90379.

Open file 677.03 KB, 220x124
>>111627 >>111628 >>111630 >>111631 I get it. Here's the thing you might not have considered: it is an effective anti-spam measure. Can I turn R9K off? Yes. Does the server de-duplicate and re-use files by hash? Also yes. With R9K off, you could, effectively do what you want: re-post an image from an old thread on the board, to a new thread, and the server will still just serve the one file. This would ALSO mean: anyone who wants to spam and kill a thread could effectively so do: so long as they keep jumping IPs, they could post the same "HAHA EAT SHIT" image many, many times, over and over, without limit, because R9K would let each post go through, yes saving space on the server with de-dupe, but no longer gating the same image from being abused. It's unfortunate that in it's current state, R9K is whole board or nothing, I can't scope to thread-by-thread, but I'll look into it. Also, you can skirt around this issue *fairly* easily, by just converting the format of the image before uploading, though I understand on mobile that would be a pain. Anyway I understand the concern, but I hope that explains why it's this way right now.
>>111636 I figured most would know it's an anti-spam measure. and. Cool to get a real response that fast, interesting. I'm used to *this site is using a codebase from 2003 / the same image over & over would physically spam server space* being the only excuse, haha. It still seems like an overkill solution to me as it is now but I get it, makes sense when there's other stuff to worry about and truly satisfying everyone without drawbacks whatever route you go is hard anyway.