>>251752
Uh-huh, yea, I'm shitting up the thread by being an active participant in it. Are you a schizo yet, it's like the 10th time you told me I'm a schizo for trying to use the board. I cannot, not, say the exact same shit to you anytime you rear your head. One of us has to be wrong, either it's me for trying to use the board or it's you for trying to stop users from using the board.
>I don't give a flying fuck about salt or any of the artists. Being a shit disturber just to be a shit disturber will result in a ban.
Yea, we know you don't actually participate or care about this community beyond policing the board in the shitty way you see fit. Salt is literally at a self admitted low point at the second on a burn out break with his recent work not meeting his own standards. Today the dude literally retconned a page number and emailed everyone about it. I'm still floored at that. People are going to be negative nancys in here, it doesn't make them shit disturbers that should be banned. The artist is literally agreeing with some of the criticism here that you're calling shit disturbing. You'd stand outside the movie theater and ban customers who just saw a bad movie and dared to discuss it in the lobby?
I called this shit the moment you went full psycho with the schizo thread merging, in short order you'd be in the big artist threads shutting down discussions and here it is. We've got 'community notes' slamming people for posting too much in the thread, we've got the official janny comment threatening anyone who isn't in full hugbox mode with a ban. We're at the step right before the 0 discussion allowed Kip thread rule, aren't we? Thanks again dude, we needed this thread shitted on too like we needed the discussion thread permanently shitted upon by you.