>>88440
Honestly MOST of the time I dislike a model it isn't the woman herself but rather the quality of the pictures & videos (too close, fish-eye lens, always the same angle [especially always low-angle], shaky camera, low audio levels, visibly filthy environment in background, etc.) and something about the performance (excessive or bad makeup, too much or not enough talking). Sometimes I'm just not into the specifics of whatever fetish they're selling, like slob/messy (food should be eaten, not wasted! get that food in your face, girl!) but that's less commonly a persistent problem compared to just shitty camerawork & performance.
>BigCuties, especially MizzPuss
Camera is almost perpetually way too close so we can't see the whole model.
>Ivy Davenport & FatMissT (Tara)
Just the worst makeup possible, like Mimi from the Drew Carey Show clown tier
>LunaLove
Always putting the camera on a coffee table for this stupid up-angle which does NOT make her look bigger, it just gives me nausea.
>Tons of Curvage Models
Whispering at a camera twenty feet away in a room with a noisy TV or air-conditioner. Completely inaudible. I know a microphone is an additional expense but the hilarious part is that often some basic noise reduction cleans it all up; shame Curvage doesn't offer basic editing for a small fee.